Consequentialist vs nonconsequentialist

Jeremy Benthambest known for his advocacy of utilitarianism Nature has placed mankind under the governance of two sovereign masters, pain and pleasure.

Consequentialist vs nonconsequentialist

Act consequentialism Act consequentialism looks at every single moral choice anew. A particular action is morally good only if it produces more overall good than any alternative action.

Good points of act consequentialism A flexible system Act consequentialism is flexible and can take account of any set of circumstances, however exceptional. This removes many of the problems of act consequentialism. The rules that should be adopted are the rules that would produce the best results if they were adopted by most people.

Philosophers express this with greater precision: An action is morally right if and only if it does not violate the set of rules of behaviour whose general acceptance in the community would have the best consequences--that is, at least as good as any rival set of rules or no rules at all.

Internet Encyclopedia of Philisophy: These variations are themselves derived in the same way as the general rules Other forms of consequentialism Negative Consequentialism Negative consequentialism is the inverse of ordinary consequentialism.

Good actions are the ones that produce the least harm.

Cookies on the BBC website

A person should choose the act that does the least amount of harm to the greatest number of people.Consequentialism is the class of normative ethical theories holding that the consequences of one's conduct are the ultimate basis for any judgment about the rightness or wrongness of that conduct.

Thus, from a consequentialist standpoint, a morally right act (or omission from acting) is one that will produce a good outcome, or consequence. Sep 25,  · Consequentialism says that right or wrong depend on the consequences of an act, and that the more good consequences are produced, the better the act.

Video: Consequentialist & Non-Consequentialist Views of Morality. We all want to do the right thing, but how do we know if our actions are moral. Explore the competing theories of consequentialism.

On this page

Consequentialism, deontology, and virtue ethics are moral theories that evaluate morality on the basis of different factors. This Buzzle post explains the consequentialism vs.

Consequentialist vs nonconsequentialist

deontology vs. . Consequentialism is the class of normative ethical theories holding that the consequences of one's conduct are the ultimate basis for any judgment about the rightness or wrongness of that conduct.

Thus, from a consequentialist standpoint, a morally right act (or omission from acting) is one that will produce a good outcome, or consequence. In this essay Kant’s ethical non-consequentialist theory will be briefly investigated and a comparison drawn between the two different theories in order to establish merit in employment thereof in practice.

Consequentialist vs nonconsequentialist
A Comparison: Consequentialism Vs. Deontology Vs. Virtue Ethics